A NOVEL ULTRASONIC FLOWMETER CONCEPT
James E. Gallagher, Chief Executive Officer
Savant Measurement Corporation
ABSTRACT
Ultrasonic flowmeters have been the center of attention
within the natural gas industry for the last several
years. To date, current commercial devices have been
developed using Gaussian or proprietary integration
techniques to measure the velocity of the flowing
stream to eliminate the sensitivity to piping induced
installation effects. When these proprietary integration
techniques are applied, the ultrasonic meter is required
to determine the swirl and asymmetry of the flowing
stream. Published research has indicated both integration
techniques are limited in their sensitivities to installation
effects.
This paper presents a novel ultrasonic flowmeter concept,
proposed by the author, that combines0.25 percent
under field piping configurations for natural gas
applications. This performance has not been demonstrated
by any commercial or scientific design to date. The
novel concept accomplishes this performance with fewer
transducers and chordal paths resulting in considerable
savings in manufacturing costs.
Combining these technologies into a flowmeter has
created a method to measure the 'real time' health
of the flowmeter.
To determine the validity of the invention, experiments
were conducted in natural gas using a two-path ultrasonic
flowmeter. Perturbation tests were conducted under
the following fluid dynamic conditions:
The results for the experiments demonstrate the validity
of the concept and the performance of this novel approach.
FLOWMETERS
Flowmeters are generally classified as either energy
additive or energy extractive. Energy additive meters
introduce energy into the flowing stream to determine
flowrate. Common examples of energy additive meters
are magnetic meters and ultrasonic meters. Energy extractive
meters require energy from the flowing stream, usually
in the form of pressure drop, to determine the fluid's
flowrate. Examples of energy extractive meters are PD
meters, turbine meters, vortex meters and head meters
(orifice, pitot, venturi, etc.).
Further subclasses of flowmeters are based on determining
if the meter is discrete or inferential.
Discrete meters determine the flowrate by continuously
separating a flow stream into discrete segments and
counting them. Inference meters infer flowrate by measuring
some dynamic property of the flowing stream.

ULTRASONIC FLOWMETERS
Ultrasonic flowmeters have been the center
of attention within the natural gas industry for the
last decade. To date, current commercial devices have
been developed using Gaussian or proprietary integration
techniques. When the proprietary integration technique
is applied, the ultrasonic meter is required to determine
the swirl and asymmetry of the flowing stream. Published
research has indicated both integration techniques are
limited in their sensitivities to installation effects
and have demonstrated additional bias uncertainties
due to piping configurations.
Acoustic flow measurements are well known. They involve
determining the average chordal velocity of the flowing
stream from the difference in transit time of acoustic
pulses transmitted in the downstream and upstream directions
respectively between acoustic transducers. These acoustic
pulses are transmitted along a chordal path, and a measure
of the chordal velocity is determined from the measured
transit times. The fluid can be gas or liquid.
The transit times depend on the mean velocity of the
chordal path, the flow profile and the turbulence structure
of the flowing stream. The reliability of the measured
chordal velocity depend on the path length, the configuration
and radial position of the acoustic path, the transmitted
acoustic pulse form, the electronic timing and gating
performance and the calculations involved in reducing
the measured parameters to the mean chordal velocity.
The acoustic transducers may be mounted in an invasive
or non-invasive manner. An invasive mount invades the
channel's containment structure through an aperture.
An invasive mount does not transmit acoustic pulses
through the containment structure, sometimes referred
to as 'wetted' transducers. A non-invasive mount transmits
the acoustic pulses through all or part of the channel's
containment structure, sometimes referred to as 'non-wetted'
transducers.
The invasive mount is further classified as intrusive
or non-intrusive. The intrusive term relates to a part
or all of the transducer intruding into the flowing
medium. The nonintrusive term defines the transducer
mounting as not intruding into the flowing stream.
The acoustic paths may be arranged in a reflective,
non-reflective or hybrid geometry.
A reflective path is arranged in a geometric manner
to reflect one or more times off the containment structure
or a reflective body installed inside the channel.
A non-reflective path is arranged in a geometric manner
that does not reflect off the containment structure
or a reflective body inside the channel.
A hybrid design employs any combination of both reflective
and non-reflective paths and/or invasive and non-invasive
configurations.
The number of paths and their placement in the channel
vary among commercial and scientific designs.

STATE-OF-THE-ART
The state-of-the-art for ultrasonic flowmeters employs
one of three integration methods to determine the average
flowing velocity in a circular duct. The first two methods
are commercially available. The third method is under
development by the scientific community.
The first commercial method, known as Gaussian integration,
is based on a fixed number of paths whose fixed locations
and weighting factors are based on the numerical Gaussian
method selected by the designer. Several Gaussian methods
are available from publications (Jacobi & Gauss,
Pannell & Evans, etceteras). The advantages of this
approach are clear. No additional information of the
flow profile is required for calculating the average
flowing velocity. The weighting factors are fixed in
advance as a result of the number of paths and the Gaussian
method selected by the designer. The minimum number
of paths is four regardless of the Gaussian method selected.
The second commercial method, which is a proprietary
method, determines the swirl and/or asymmetry of the
flowing stream by transmitting acoustic pulses along
two or more paths having different degrees of sensitivity
to swirl and to symmetry. The proprietary method uses
a 'trade secret' matrix to determine the weighting factors
for the chordal velocities based on the measured swirl
and asymmetry. The recommended number of paths is five
for the proprietary method.
The third scientific method, now under development
by the National Institute of Standards and Technology
(NIST) is an eleven-path arrangement. The unit, termed
the advanced ultrasonic flowmeter (AUFM), is based on
computer modeling of pipe flow fields and simulations
of their corresponding ultrasonic signatures. The sensor
arrangement for the AUFM will have enhanced velocity
profile diagnostic capabilities for deviations from
non-ideal pipe flows. Interpreting the signals produced
by the ultrasonic sensors will be a pattern recognition
system capable of classifying the approaching unknown
flow among one of a number of typical flows contained
in its electronic onboard library. This library will
be created using results from computational fluid dynamics
simulations. Both commercial methods perform well in
the laboratory environment of 'fully developed' pipe
flow.
In the industrial environment, multiple piping configurations
are assembled in series generating complex problems
for flow metering engineers. The challenge is to minimize
the difference between the actual or "real"
flow conditions and the "fully developed"
flow conditions in a pipe to maintain a minimum error
associated with the selected metering device's performance.
The two state-of-the-art commercial methods attempt
to accomplish this objective.
With respect to installation effects and the near
term flow field, the correlating parameters that impact
similarity vary with meter type and design. However,
it is generally accepted that the level of sensitivity
to time-averaged velocity profile, turbulence structure,
and bulk swirl is dependent on the metering technology
and the specific design of that meter.
Significant research from the European Gas Research
Group (GERG) and the Gas Research Institute (GRI) has
attempted to quantify the additional uncertainties associated
with installation effects. The first commercial method
has an additional bias uncertainty of ±0.0 to
3.0 percent due to various piping configurations. The
second commercial method has an additional bias uncertainty
of ± 0.0 to 1.0 percent due to various piping
configurations. Obviously both methods have clear disadvantages
in 'real' performance to the user community.
THE ARTEFACT PACKAGE
A novel ultrasonic flowmeter concept combines the strengths
of acoustic and isolating flow conditioner technologies
to determine the flow velocity and/or throughput in
a channel. The performance of this novel concept exceeds
the current technology performance by an order of four
to twelve times and has significant savings in manufacturing
costs. The novel approach allows for creation of a method
to measure the 'real time' health of the flowmeter.
The isolating flow conditioner eliminates swirl (less
than 2° of swirl) and provides an axisymmetric velocity
profile (±5 percent between parallel chords)
upstream of the acoustic path(s). Acoustic pulses are
transmitted along a chordal path, and a measure of the
chordal velocity is determined from the measured transit
times. An individual chordal weighting factor is applied
to the chordal velocity to obtain the average flow velocity
and/or throughput of the medium. An individual calibration
factor for the chord, based on laboratory testing, may
be applied in lieu of the weighting factor or in addition
to the weighting factor.
The flowmeter uses a fixed weighting factor based
on the position of the acoustic path(s) and the turbulence
level of the flowing medium. For two-path or more designs,
the weighting factor may be correlated on the chordal
position, a relaxation term related to the profile development
and the turbulence level of the flowing medium.
Combining these technologies into a flowmeter has
created a method to measure the 'real time' health of
the flowmeter. A one-path design provides a low-level
'real time' health of the flowmeter. A two or more path
design provides a high-level 'real time' health of the
flowmeter.
In the industrial environment, a flowmeter with these
built-in diagnostic capabilities is referred to as a
'smart' or 'intelligent' flowmeter.
EXPERIMENTAL APPARATUS
To determine the validity of the single and multi-path
ultrasonic designs, experiments were conducted in natural
gas at the Gas Research Institute's Meter Research Facility
under the auspices of Southwest Research Institute.
Independent research has been conducted extensively
on 200mm meters with both single path and multi-path
ultrasonic designs. The pipe velocity was varied from
1.5 to 21.3 mps (5 to 70 fps) resulting in pipe Reynolds
numbers from approximately 600,000 to 7,500,000.
Perturbation tests were conducted under the following
fluid dynamic conditions:
- fully developed flow
- swirling flow
- non-symmetric, non-swirling flow
Fully developed flow was established with the use of
an isolating flow conditioner, a minimum of forty diameters
(40D) of straight pipe, a tee mounted in the same plane
and approximately eighty diameters (80D) of straight
pipe prior to the test section.
Non-symmetric, non-swirling flow was established with
the use of an isolating flow conditioner, a minimum
of forty diameters (40D) of straight pipe, and a tee
mounted in the same plane prior to the test section.
Swirling flow was established with the use of an isolating
flow conditioner, a minimum of forty diameters (40D)
of straight pipe, followed by a ninety-degree (90°)
elbow and a tee out of plane prior to the test section.
This combination has been known to generate swirl angles
of fifteen to twenty degrees (15° to 20°)
SINGLE PATH OR MORE RESULTS The experiments demonstrated
the validity of the novel concept. The single-path approach
demonstrated an uncertainty of ±0.50 percent
of actual flowrate in both perturbed and 'good' flow
conditions for velocities greater than 3 mps (10 fps).
While this performance equals the five-path proprietary
design discussed previously, it achieves this performance
with one-fifth of the transducers and chordal paths.
To determine the validity of the two-path or more invention,
experiments were conducted in natural gas using a two-path
and a threepath invention.
Again, the experiments demonstrated the validity of
the novel concept. The two-path designs demonstrated
an uncertainty of ±0.25 percent or better of
actual flowrate in both perturbed and fully developed
flow conditions for velocities greater than 3 mps (10
fps). While this performance exceeds the five-path proprietary
design or the four-path Gaussian designs by an order
of two to six times, it accomplishes this performance
with at least one-half of the transducers and chordal
paths.
The three-path design demonstrated a performance of
±0.15 percent of actual flowrate in both perturbed
and fully developed flow conditions for velocities greater
than 3 mps (10 fps). This performance exceeds the five-path
proprietary design or the four-path Gaussian designs
by an order of four to twelve times. This performance
has not been demonstrated by any commercial or scientific
design to date. The novel concept accomplishes this
performance with fewer transducers and chordal paths
resulting in considerable savings in manufacturing costs.
A four or more path design is predicted to have a performance
of ±0.10 percent or better of actual flowrate
in both perturbed and fully developed flow conditions
for velocities greater than 3 mps (10 fps). Of course,
it is important to note that the claimed uncertainty
for state-of-the-art worldclass flow laboratories is
approximately onefourth of one percent (±0.25%)
using natural gas or air as the flowing medium.



SMART' OR 'INTELLIGENT' FLOWMETER
Combining these technologies into a flowmeter has created
a method to measure the 'real time' health of the flowmeter.
A onepath design provides a low-level 'real time' health
of the flowmeter. A two or more path design provides
a high-level 'real time' health of the flowmeter. In
the industrial environment, a flowmeter with these built-in
diagnostic capabilities is referred to as a 'smart'
or 'intelligent' flowmeter.
Due to the brevity of the paper, it is not possible
to explore the 'real time' health monitoring of the
flowmeter.
However, the following is the VOS residual analysis
for all meter designs for the complete experimental
pattern.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
The following statistical results indicate the level
of confidence in the stated performance for the various
path designs.
The statistical results as a function of mean pipe
velocity for the path designs are as

The statistical results as a function
of fully developed flow or perturbed flow for the path
designs are as follows –


Notes:
(1) Statistics are for greater than 6 fps.
Residuals’ Plots
Due to the abbreviated length of the paper,
we will present the compete set of the residuals’ graphs
for the two-path designs only.


CONCLUSION
This paper presents a novel ultrasonic flowmeter concept,
proposed by the author that combines the strengths of
ultrasonic and isolating flow conditioner technology.
The novel ultrasonic flowmeter in the "real world"
environment and the laboratory environment provides
the following:
- minimizes additional bias error due to piping induced
flow disturbances
- ensures that the laboratory calibration is transferable
to the field
- provides advanced 'health' monitoring of the flowmeter
- significantly lowers cost of manufacturing
The results for the experiments demonstrate the validity
of the concept and the performance of this novel approach
in the "real world" environment and the laboratory
environment -
- · single-path designs demonstrated a performance
of ±0.50 %
- · two-path designs demonstrated a performance
of ±0.25 %
- · three-path designs demonstrated a performance
of ±0.15 %
- · four-path designs with an anticipated performance
of ±0.10 %
The present invention relates to a method for ensuring
the characteristics of the flow of a medium in a channel
by installing an isolating flow conditioner, then using
the transit times of acoustic pulses, to precisely measure
the velocity along the acoustic path(s). The research
results significantly outperform current commercial
devices at a much lower cost of manufacturing. In addition,
the present invention provides the ability to measure
the 'real time' health of the flowmeter
Based on the results obtained from these prototypes,
there are indications that the technology may equal
or exceed the uncertainty levels claimed by gas flow
laboratories. However, extensive research is required
before uncertainty claims of this nature can be substantiated
through solid research and round robin testing programs.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
A team conducts all projects, including this one. The
author would like to express his sincere appreciation
of the members of the team for their contributions towards
this application research project. The Savant team members
were Mr. Paul Johnson, Mr. Mike Saunders and the author.
The Southwest Research team members were Mr. Terence
Grimley and the operating staff of Gas Research Institute's
Metering Research Facility.
|